scroll

Sometimes Alternative Solutions are under performing

Back to Blog Articles
28 February 2017

Perhaps projects are getting faster and perhaps more defects are cropping up as a result, but there seem to be more and more requests for alternative performance solution reports by builders and architects.

Perhaps projects are getting faster and perhaps more defects are cropping up as a result, but there seem to be more and more requests for alternative performance solution reports by builders and architects.

Many construction professionals view an alternative solution as a concession report, which it is not. A concession can only be argued under BCA part D3.4, which is an area of a building that a person with a disability should not need to access due to the work and safety intent of this area.

Under the performance requirements, an alternative solution must adhere to equivalent equity and safety standards in accordance with the Deemed to Satisfy Provision of the BCA.

As a writer of alternative solutions, I do acknowledge that I have prepared alternative solutions for technical non compliances such as minor infringements in door clear widths, latch side clearances, ambulant cubicles and accessible toilets.

However what I will not accept or support is alternative solutions relating to life safety non compliances.

Stairs is a classic point of reference. This is where people with unsteady gait/mobility impairment can really hurt themselves. For example, I have seen an alternative solution report where a stair in a hospital had one compliant handrail and it was accepted that the other non-compliant handrail (that was too high) was OK as long as signage was used to direct people the nearby lift.
Whilst this sounds fine in theory, in practice it could be dire. Sometimes people don’t see signs. Sometimes people just want to use stairs. Sometimes people get in trouble where they are mid-way in using the stair and they have no option then to use the lift. Falls and injury could result.

The handrail could have been easily lowered to compliant height, however the builder judged it was too costly and shopped around for an alternative solution.

Alternative solutions need to be safe. They need to prevent people from falling, slipping, tripping or cutting themselves, especially those people that are fragile.

Private Certifiers must be vigilant. If an alternative solution is not safe, then they should not accept it.
Alternative solution reports, with regards to accessibility (BCA Parts D3, E3 and F2) can only be prepared by a fully accredited members of ACAA.

David Goding

Contact us

Have a
Question?

Have a project or design that needs an expert accessibility consultant? The team at MGAC are ready to hear from you.

Our skilled consultants are specialists in the application of DDA, UD, Accessibility, and Human Movement related to Australian Standards, NCC and Safety in Design.

Fill out the contact form and one of our access consultants will be in contact within 48 hours. Alternatively, you can contact one of our offices directly.

Please complete the email form and we will come back to you as soon as possible. Alternatively you can contact us directly using the contact details on the right

Our Offices

Sydney
Studio 6, Level 1
56 Bowman Street
Pyrmont NSW, 2009
(02) 9692 9322
Melbourne
Unit 304, 87 Gladstone St
South Melbourne, VIC 3205
(03) 9690 0102
Brisbane
99 Kingfisher Road
Victoria Point
Brisbane QLD, 4165
0476 299 321
Perth
24 Mumford Place
Balcatta, Perth, WA, 6021
0414 576 891